Search Appropriateness Statement Package
Contacts
< 1 min read
The following section covers a number of commonly used contact practices: in-person contacts, remote contacts (telephone, kiosk), and the frequency of contacts (weekly, monthly, quarterly). Each area also includes implementation considerations on how organizations can prepare themselves to make changes to their contact policy. Finally, this section contains appropriateness statements which include the results of the empirical evidence analysis.
The following table shows a summary of the results from the evidence analysis. The practices is categorized according to four levels: appropriate, promising, inconclusive, and not evidence-based depending on the amount and type of research available (see Introduction Table 2 for definitions). Also included are the perceptions of individuals working in supervision agencies and individuals that have experience with the justice system to illustrate different views about the contacts. The following table summarizes the evidence level, the probation staff perceptions, and JSI perceptions of the practices in this section.
Table 3
Evidence Summary for Contact Practices
Practice
Research Support
Field Support: Low Risk
Probation
JSI
Field Support: Med/High Risk
Probation
JSI
In-Person Contacts
Evidence-Based*
Moderate
Moderate
Wide
Moderate
Telephone Contacts
Promising
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Kiosk Contacts
Promising
Moderate
Moderate
Minimal
Moderate
Frequency of Contacts
Weekly
Inconclusive
Minimal
Minimal
Wide
Moderate
Monthly
Inconclusive
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Quarterly
Inconclusive
Moderate
Moderate
Minimal
Moderate
* = Evidence-based with qualifications
Similar Topics